On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 21:42 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
> Additionally, there is some history to Bugzappers as a separate
project
which was before my time, but as Johann has explained it to
me, it was
something of a 'I'm taking my ball and going home!' thing that
led to it
being set up as a separate sub-project outside of QA
.IIRC Bugzappers as a group existed years before "QA" as a project
existed but that isn't really important now.
Put those together, and it seems sensible to at the minimum
drop the
Bugzappers onboarding process. We can probably look at moving
the useful
content from the Bugzappers wiki space back into the QA space
at some
future point
Yeah. When we originally setup Bugzappers, we had quite a few members
actively triaging, creating scripts and so on for a while and I
believe it did improve the overall quality of the project and provided
a way for people to do some drive by contributions. We might want to
revive this effort again at some point. Matej Cepl and others had
some scripts, browser extensions etc to help out.
Sure, it'd be nice to have some triage action going on again, it just
seems a bit artificial for 'Bugzappers' and 'QA' to be separate things,
and it doesn't seem like anyone's left who really cares about the
separation, so far as I can tell.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net