On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 09:59 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:46:50 -1000, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> >
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> Well I never knew about that handy little tool. Thanks for pointing that
> out, knocked out a bunch of them.
Here's a very important part of the Update Feedback Guidelines every
tester ought to understand:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines#Previously_re...
| Previously reported bugs
|
| If your testing uncovers no problems but you see that another tester has
| identified a serious problem with the package, please try to replicate
| their problem, and post negative feedback if you are now able to confirm
| it.
|
| If you are not able to confirm the problem but you suspect this may be
| because you cannot recreate the necessary conditions, please post neutral (!)
| feedback noting that you were unable to duplicate the problem. Only post
| positive feedback if you are sure your testing indicates the other
| reporter's negative feedback is a mistake.
If we don't adhere to these guidelines, we would be vote against eachother
often. Please be very careful with your feedback in bodhi if you see that
previous testers have voted -1 already.
Thanks, Michael, that is indeed important. fedora-easy-karma shows all
existing comments, so it's easy enough to check through them before
filing your vote.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net