On 04/27/2011 03:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/27/2011 07:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 06:56 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>>> Fedora, as a volunteeer effort, cannot.
>> It's worse. I fear Fedora will loose contributors, because Fedora is not
>> shipping the DE these users want.
> We ship every major currently maintained desktop. Which one do you think
> is missing?
Adam, please.
All of this thread is about "Gnome 3 not being a replacement for what
used to be Gnome 2",
I don't think you carefully read what Adam wrote:
"We ship every major *currently maintained* desktop."
AFAIK, GNOME 2 is no long about to be maintained.... Therefore it
doesn't meet the criteria.
I think it is clear.... The upstream folks at
gnome.org aren't
interested in maintaining GNOME 2. So, if there is a body of people
wanting it, they can take it over.