On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:31:41 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The general idea was to increase activity within the QA community and
improve reporting at the same time without having them running around
the whole internet while doings so.
Sure, but duplicating upstream work seems not very productive to me.
If the community prefers to run to various upstreams for this info we
can just as well stop reporting to Red Hat's bugzilla and report
directly upstream instead. ( something I have been very much against
in the past for the very same reasons )
Well, in the case of bugs there's give and take and bidirectional
communication. In the case of debugging info/steps it's more of a
static list. If upstream already produces such a list, shouldn't we
just point to that?
kevin