2006/1/26, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp(a)redhat.com>:
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 19:38 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> manually for the test/devel releases which is limited. If you must use
> a everything installation on unusual occasions then kickstart is
> powerful enough to manage that and tons more. If you can work on making
> kickstart profile generation in a web interface and similar things
> easier apart from the system-config-kickstart GUI tool I would welcome
> that. Work is already being done to document kickstart capabilities
> better in the installation guide.
Requiring kickstart abilities to achieve that is a bit over the top,
don't you think? I don't think we want to put the hurdles much higher
than the "yum --exclude=\*-debuginfo\* install \*" if we want people to
test Fedora Rawhide (and we would effectively do it if we e.g.
documented the kickstart but not the yum way).
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp(a)redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
in my opinion everything install should definitely available since it
helps with testing aswell doesent it?
and generally... we "everything installers" test alot more aspects of
the system. i wouldnt want to see that option removed personally.
just my personal opinion.
regards,
Rudolf Kastl