-----Original Message----- From: Dennis Gilmore [mailto:dennis@dgilmore.net] Sent: Thu, July 24, 2003 3:59 PM To: rhl-beta-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1 kernel? gcc 3.3 compiler?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Once upon a time at band camp Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:56 pm, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:09:14 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
at the risk of being perhaps a little too far out there on the bleeding edge, i'm thinking of dumping the 2.6.0-test1 kernel on my severn system today, just to push the boundaries.
I ran 2.6.0-test1 yesterday with only one noticeable
problem (couldn't
access cdrom) which I didn't have time to look into.
i actualy did have the cd issue one time i tried to access a cd modprobe ide-cd fixed that
Same here, I had to add 'modprobe ide-cd' line to rc.modules file to make CD work without manual interaction.
Dennis
in addition, what are the implications of upgrading to gcc 3.3? and what other RPMs would have to go along with that to have a usable system?
The beta comes with gcc 3.3 as the default compiler (and gcc32 3.2.3 for the 2.4 kernel).
-- Rhl-beta-list mailing list Rhl-beta-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/H+Yu4hBQ1unFjm4RAjvXAJ9E/jdfJdteGXrZcsFHJdTzZoz7PQCgmiL0 f2YeigSp6/rbMaoL0RmP/fY= =5wvp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Rhl-beta-list mailing list Rhl-beta-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list