-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Gilmore [mailto:dennis@dgilmore.net]
Sent: Thu, July 24, 2003 3:59 PM
To: rhl-beta-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1 kernel? gcc 3.3 compiler?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Once upon a time at band camp Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:56 pm,
Gerald Henriksen
wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:09:14 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
> > at the risk of being perhaps a little too far out there
> >on the bleeding edge, i'm thinking of dumping the 2.6.0-test1
> >kernel on my severn system today, just to push the boundaries.
>
> I ran 2.6.0-test1 yesterday with only one noticeable
problem (couldn't
> access cdrom) which I didn't have time to look into.
i actualy did have the cd issue one time i tried to access a
cd modprobe
ide-cd fixed that
Same here, I had to add 'modprobe ide-cd' line to rc.modules file to make CD
work without manual interaction.
Dennis
>
> > in addition, what are the implications of upgrading to
> >gcc 3.3? and what other RPMs would have to go along with
> >that to have a usable system?
>
> The beta comes with gcc 3.3 as the default compiler (and gcc32 3.2.3
> for the 2.4 kernel).
>
>
>
> --
> Rhl-beta-list mailing list
> Rhl-beta-list(a)redhat.com
>
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/H+Yu4hBQ1unFjm4RAjvXAJ9E/jdfJdteGXrZcsFHJdTzZoz7PQCgmiL0
f2YeigSp6/rbMaoL0RmP/fY=
=5wvp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Rhl-beta-list mailing list
Rhl-beta-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list