On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Tim Niemueller <tim(a)niemueller.de> wrote:
But in the given situation maintenance burden just one aspect.
Packaging
something non-robotic into a "robotic udev catchall package" is a bad idea.
Valid point. Maybe I gave too many examples -- I am preparing stuff
for only robots at the moment, but there is some ambiguity: the same
boards can be used for automation without robots.
Is "Controller boards" a better umbrella name?
cheers,
m
--
martin(a)laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
-
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff