On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 19:33 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:50:13 -0800
Adam Williamson <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:23 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> > Requirements:
> > - make post-install changes to the images before distribution
> > - specify partition table type
> > - create users on the image
> >
> > Are there other requirements for openqa images?
>
> For some of the images what we primarily need is some specific
> partition table / layout, not any particular contents; as you say it
> may not make sense to do that with the same tool, but that is one of
> the openQA requirements.
Just to make sure I was being clear - I was referring to the empty disk
images (embedded updates.img, embedded ks, freespace etc. - the
stuff that's only using guestfish) that are made with createhdds.sh, not
the installed image. If I'm understanding correctly, it's the installed
images (minimal, desktop) that would be most useful to rebuild on a
regular basis - did I misunderstand something? Do all the images for
openqa need to come from the same tool? I suspect that the guestfish
"(mostly) empty disk" methods could be run just about anywhere at most
once a release.
That all sounds accurate. No, they don't need to come out of the same
tool, though of course it's a bit more complex if we have to handle two
different image creation processes.
That being said, it sounds like precise partitioning is another
requirement.
Yeah, and it's at least feasible we might need to combine the two,
though I don't think that's the case for any of the current images.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net