The following projects have been moved to pagure.io:
https://pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
https://pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
https://pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb_api
https://pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb_frontend
https://pagure.io/taskotron/execdb
https://pagure.io/taskotron/taskotron-trigger
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
I have not deleted the bitbucket repos yet but I have removed write
access for pretty much everyone so that there are no accidental pushes.
Please look over the repos to see if I missed anything. Once we're sure
everything is there, we can delete the bitbucket projects or just
replace them with READMEs that point to the new pagure repos.
Also, I'm wondering whether we want to have a separate namespace/group
for resultsdb. I'm fine with it the way it is but figured that I would
ask to see what other folks thought.
Tim
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:21:16 -0700 Tim Flink <tflink(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit
more detail out.
Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git
projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and
it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need to
find a new home for blockerbugs but I figure that now is as good of a
time as any to get all of our git projects in the same place.
I'm proposing the following moves:
* Move all Taskotron projects to pagure.io using the taskotron group:
- pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
- pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
- etc.
* Move blockerbugs under the existing fedora-qa namespace in pagure:
- pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
I'm not sure if there are any plans for the openqa stuff that
currently lives on bitbucket but it'd be nice to see that moved as
well.
Any objections, comments, concerns?
Tim