On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 17:27 +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > Ok, attached is a patch, where I fixed the syntax errors and I
> > added an "init_all" option. Means by default no behavior changes
> > against the current version. If admin specifies "init_all", the
missing
> > limits will be set from the one of process with PId 1.
>
> I'm just slightly opposed to the 'init_all' option name. Perhaps
> something like 'reset_all' or 'reset_from_init' would better
describe
> the functionality?
I'm confused, I thought I had answered already, but cannot find my mail ...
I have no problem with renaming that option, but I don't like "reset*",
because that sounds like there are modified default values. But in reality,
we use the values from the init process, which are not necessarly the
default system values.
OK, then what about "set_from_init" or more simple "set_all"?
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb