On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 13:31 +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:49:12AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > The fix for Sourceforge bug 3035919 introduced a regression in
> > pam_access described here:
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732081
> >
> > The attached patch tries to hopefully fix it and not introduce another
> > regression in this fragile code. We need to try to split the user
> > pattern on this regexp:
> > (@*[^@]+)((a)+.*)
>
> Why this regexp? Looking at the documentation, it should rather be
> (@?[^@]+)((a)+.*), shouldn't it?
@@netgroup@<whatever> would be correct syntax as well although probably
with a little usefulness. And it is no problem to support it.