On Tue, Mar 31, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Út, 2015-03-31 at 14:04 +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the last Linux-PAM release is now 1,5 year ago, since then we
> made quite some code changes and the bug tracker looks pretty
> good, means 3 enhancement requests and one defect are left.
>
> So I would like to release a Linux-PAM 1.2.0 version during the
> next days.
>
> Any opinions?
Yes, I agree. Do we have such enhancements in the git that warrant the
1.2.0 name?
Beside the huge amount of changes (where I already think they are too
much for minor 1.1.8->1.1.9 move), we have:
- Alternativ vendor configuration files
- lot of changes of libpam, including new functions.
(Ok, what to do with the "1.1.9" symbols? Correctly, we would
need to change that to 1.2.0 ...)
So in the end I would vote for 1.2.0.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)