https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080
--- Comment #20 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Mattia Verga from comment #16)
I would expect license files of an installed package to reside under
/usr/share/licenses/ so I would not consider those as "duplicated".
Otherwise I would expect the license files under the dist-info to be
removed...
There is no real reason for this expectation. See e.g.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproje...
(In reply to David Shea from comment #17)
To clarify what was going on with the licenses: the specification
for
license-files is kind of in flux in the python-packaging specs, and 'wheel'
and 'setuptools' (in setup.cfg) have different expected formats. On F36 and
F37, wheel was mis-interpreting a license-file string in setup.cfg, and
installing nothing.
Is this a bug we might be able to fix? Do you have some details to your
investigation so I don't have to start from scratch? Feel free to open a new
bugzilla for python-wheel not to clutter this package review. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080