Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-08-02 12:26:20
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
> * ruby(abi)
> - All ruby related packages must have "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8"
> ( And I usually recomend to add also "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8"
> for consistency ).
Well, that doesn't work on EPEL 5, because there's no ruby(abi) provided.
$ rpm -q ruby
ruby-1.8.5-5.el5_3.7
$
$ rpm -q --provides ruby | grep "ruby(abi)"
$
Well,
$ rpm -qp --provides ruby-libs-1.8.5-5.el5_2.6.i386.rpm 2>/dev/null | grep abi
ruby(abi) = 1.8
> * ImageMagick Dependency
> - Due to bug 500565 (i.e due to the function
> static void test_Magick_version(void) in ext/RMagick/rmmain.c),
> when ruby-RMagick is rebuilt with ImageMagick 6.2.8.0, RMagick
> will require ImageMagick 6.2.8.X
>
> ( i.e. even if the soname of the library in ImageMagick won't change
> between 6.2.8.X and 6.2.9.Y, RMagick rebuilt with ImageMagick
> 6.2.8.X won't work with ImageMagick 6.2.9.Y (by default) ).
Well, ImageMagick is from RHEL thus never will get incompatible upgraded and
there never will be a version upgrade, just security backports. If ImageMagick
would get upgraded on RHEL, that would anyway break many things. I can add a
hard dependency to "ImageMagick = 6.2.8.0", if that makes you happy. Next RHEL
will anyway need ruby-RMagick 2.x.
Well, actually I don't know well about RHEL's policy (I don't have
RHEL or CentOS), however for this I will leave it to you.
> * htmldoc
> - Would you explain why you pass "--disable-htmldoc" to configure?
> ( By the way it seems that creating html documents also fixes
> shebangs automatically )
> ! By the way as far as I am correct "BR: libwmf" is needed when
creating
> html documents, would you check that?
Building documentation fails, that verdana.ttf or arial.ttf is required but
not available on the system. It's looking for /usr/share/fonts/defaults/
TrueType/<fontname>, if I remember the path correctly. Nothing at Fedora is
seemingly providing that.
Ah, actually this is a bug in RHEL ImageMagick (6.2.8.0-4.el5_1.1),
/usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.2.8/config/type.xml contains
<include file="type-windows.xml" /> , this is the culprit.
(I just remembered that with Fedora 7 or 8 ImageMagick ruby-RMagick
htmldoc didn't build due to the same reason...)
Perhaps RHEL won't update ImageMagick due to this reason, so
for now I will accept --without-htmldoc
> * configure v.s. setup.rb
> - Well, I think if "configure -> make" is used to compile RMagick,
> "make install" or so should be used to install files.
>
> If you use "ruby setup.rb install", perhaps "ruby setup.rb
config/setup"
> or so is preferable instead of "configure -> make".
Maybe I did something wrong, but that way I was not able to build the package.
There's a *.h.in and another *.in for example which only gets handled by the
./configure, otherwise the build poorly failed for me.
Okay.
Please add ruby(abi) dependency.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This package (ruby-RMagick) for EL-5 is approved by mtasaka
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.