Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2009-06-12 14:16:44 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
> rpmlint output:
> xorriso.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
> /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/xorriso.pc
Removed during %install and also communicated with upstream to remove it, he
agreed.
OK, please add comment about this to the spec file.
> NEEDSWORK
> - License is GPLv2 and GPL+ and (LGPLv2+ or MIT), not GPLv2.
> * Most of the files are under GPLv2.
> * cleanup is under GPL license (GPL+)
> * make_isohybrid_mr is LGPLv2+ or MIT.
fixed to: GPLv2 and GPL and LGPLv2+
You are missing the + from GPL. Please use my version..
> SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as
separate files from
> upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK
> - Not all licenses are included.
Communicated with upstream. What should i do with this, start
hunting those files myself (not preferred) or wait the next
release and fix the spec to include them?
Just wait until the next release. Fedora doesn't have a policy on this unlike
Debian, we just don't ship the license files if they're not present upstream.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.