Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184
--- Comment #6 from Juha Tuomala <tuju(a)iki.fi> 2009-06-12 12:12:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
rpmlint output:
xorriso.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/xorriso.pc
Removed during %install and also communicated with upstream to remove it, he
agreed.
xorriso.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/xorriso-0.3.8/CONTRIBUTORS
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
- Drop the CONTRIBUTORS file and add
[ -s CONTRIBUTORS ] && exit 1
fixed.
- Change
Release: 1%{?dist}
to Release: 1.%{__patchlevel}%{?dist}
fixed.
NEEDSWORK
- License is GPLv2 and GPL+ and (LGPLv2+ or MIT), not GPLv2.
* Most of the files are under GPLv2.
* cleanup is under GPL license (GPL+)
* make_isohybrid_mr is LGPLv2+ or MIT.
fixed to: GPLv2 and GPL and LGPLv2+
- No source URL provided. Source matches upstream.
fixed.
- Time stamps are not preserved, use
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
fixed.
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
NEEDSWORK
- Add Requires: pkgconfig.
Not needed as file is removed during the install and will
disappear in future releases.
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate
files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK
- Not all licenses are included.
Communicated with upstream. What should i do with this, start
hunting those files myself (not preferred) or wait the next
release and fix the spec to include them?
Spec URL:
http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso-0.3.8-2.pl00.fc10.src.rpm
f11:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1408600
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.