Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-05-02 15:12 EST
-------
(Umm... currently I don't receive any mails.. Perhaps the mail server
of my university is down...??)
(In reply to comment #24)
The XEROX files aren't actually used my my code
Umm?
Currently they are used as:
-------------------------------------------------------------
1201 ar rcs opencxx.a occ/HashTable.o occ/Environment.o occ/TypeInfo.o
occ/TypeInfoVisitor.o occ/Walker.o occ/Class.o occ/ClassWalker.o
occ/MetaClass.o occ/QuoteClass.o occ/Member.o occ/ClassBodyWalker.o
1202 g++ -shared -o ParserImpl.so syn/swalker.o syn/ast.o syn/builder.o
syn/type.o syn/dict.o syn/TypeIdFormatter.o syn/decoder.o syn/lookup.o
syn/filter.o syn/Translator.o syn/SXRGenerator.o syn/ParserImpl.o opencxx.a
-L/builddir/build/BUILD/synopsis-0.11/build/ctemp.linux-i686/src/lib -lSupport
-lSynopsis
--------------------------------------------------------------
The IDL parser is indeed licensed under GPL, which is the reason why
I split
this into a separate binary package (synopsis-idl), so it can be distributed
under GPL without any impact on the rest being released as LGPL.
No problem.
the libatomic code is an import, too, and for the fedora binary
packages not
used (I link to an external libgc).
Okay.
Well, then is this part okay?
Well, I don't know why Synopsis/Parsers/Python/__init__.py is
licensed under GPLv2+. I guess you want to release this as LGPLv2+
(the license holder seems you).
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.