https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #4)
But it's possible for a library only binary
package to use lib prefix (and libfoo-devel for the related -devel package).
it is possible but is the Debian convention , not the "RedHat" or Fedora
convention , and I prefer the RedHat / fedora one .
rpm -qi librttr will give you hint about which source package this
librtt
binary package was created from.
IMHO , is just less intuitive .
I've found curl package that already follow this convention.
(using libcurl
and libcurl-devel). So I don't think this break assumption.
Looking for curl.spec I see many things that would change .
Package APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component