https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813406
--- Comment #2 from Scott Talbert <swt(a)techie.net> ---
Thanks (again!), Robert-André!
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
- %makeinstall is deprecated, you should use %make_install
Fixed.
- license files must be installed with %license not %doc
Fixed.
Issues:
=======
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file licence.txt is not marked as %license
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
Fixed.
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wxGTK
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
This is intentional. The wxGTK package used to be wxWidgets 2.8, but it was
retired when all users moved to wxWidgets 3.0, which is the wxGTK3 package. In
this new review, I'm packaging wxWidgets 3.1. The intention is that wxGTK
package would now follow the main development releases of wxWidgets and when a
stable release is broken off, that would be package separately (e.g., when 3.2
comes out, it would be packaged as wxGTK32, and wxGTK would then follow 3.3).
wxGTK.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/wxGTK/gpl.txt
wxGTK.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/wxGTK/lgpl.txt
wxBase.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/wxBase/gpl.txt
wxBase.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/wxBase/lgpl.txt
Fixed these also.
Same spec/RPM locations.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component