https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939271
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Mikel Olasagasti Uranga from comment #2)
thanks for reviewing!
I think I addressed all the issues:
Spec URL:
https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/poke.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/poke-1.0-2.fc33.src.rpm
> - Info page are handled by %transfiletrigger, this is not necessary anymore:
I took this from
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/create-hello-world-rpm/ that
should be updated. Should I open a BZ for that?
Yes this is obsolete I believe. Try filing a bug here:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues
- the devel package should requires the libs package not the main package:
%package devel
Summary: Development files for %{name}
Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
%description devel
The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for
developing applications that use %{name}.
- the libs subpackage should probably be able to be installed independently
from the main package:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
- This should contain the license too
%files libs
%license COPYING
%{_libdir}/libpoke.so.0*
- The data subpackage should probably depend on the main package as it is
useless without it:
%package data
Summary: Data files for %{name}
BuildArch: noarch
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
%description data
Data files for %{name}.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component