Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pydotconf - python parser for dot.conf file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454921
------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant(a)gmail.com 2008-07-18 04:57 EST -------
Hi Mamoru,
Thanks for the review.
Package Updated.
SPEC URL :
http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/python-dotconf/rpm/python-dotconf.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/python-dotconf/rpm/python-dotconf-0...
(In reply to comment #7)
BTW
* Your latest package does not build on dist-f9-updates-candidate:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=722566
egg info is created on F-9/devel (I forgot for F-8)
It just did not strike me to scratch build on koji myself.
dist-f9
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723978
dist-f10
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723983
dist-f8
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723982
dist-olpc3
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723985
* Currently all branches are >= F-8 and %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 is
of no sense
(unless you are thinking of OLPC branch)
Yes I will be requesting an OLPC branch. However I have fixed it as follows
%if 1%{?olpc}
BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel
%else
BuildRequires: python-setuptools
%endif
* Currently no issue (as they are same), however would you clarify
this package is GPLv3 or GPLv3+?
Thanks for checking this up. The license should have been GPLv3+. I have fixed
this now, however it will not be reflected in the SRPM built on koji scratch
build. I have made the requisite fix in the SPEC that that I have uploaded.
Thanks
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.