Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: w3m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226535
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-27 00:46 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=150834)
-->
(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150834&action=...) [edit]
[edit]
> w3m.spec with some fixes (0.5.1-18)
>
> Well, for 0.5.1-17.fc7:
>
> * Source0
> - Please check:
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
> (A) It seems that newest gc is 6.8.
>
> * CFlags
> (Please see the attached mock build log)
> - Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed
> (for gc.a).
> For gc.a, it seems okay when ABI_FLAG is set as
> RPM_OPT_FLAGS
> And.. actually this changes debuginfo contents.
Agree.
> (B) NOTE:
> Usually gc should be seperated from this package (w3m)
> and other packages for gc should be created.
> In this case, gc package should provide shared library
> (not static archive).
> However is this too late for F7?
Don't think so. Yes static library should be removed.
What I meant here is
* can you split gc tarball from w3m srpm, create gc package
(with providing gc shared library)
from gc tarball and have w3m use gc package before F7?
* would you upgrade gc to the newest version?
> (D) Question:
> - Should all the documents in doc-jp/ files should be
> converted from EUC-JP to UTF-8?
> I think so, however, if you want to do so, please keep
> timestamps on these files even after encodings are converted,
> as these documents are 3-6 years old.
Agree.
"Agree" means that you will change Japanese documents to
UTF-8 with timestamps kept as original?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.