Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225989
Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|davidz(a)redhat.com |
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-09 14:24:20 EDT ---
- rpmlint checks return:
libbonobo.spec:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes bonobo-activation
libbonobo.spec:42: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes bonobo-activation-devel
The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all
older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update
problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it
was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if
possible.
Fix.
libbonobo.spec:72: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/bonobo-2.0/samples/bonobo-echo-2
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
libbonobo.spec:87: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
libbonobo.spec:106: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
libbonobo.spec:107: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
Fix.
libbonobo.spec: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch0: libbonobo-multishlib.patch
A patch is applied inside an %ifarch block. Patches must be applied on all
architectures and may contain necessary configure and/or code patch to be
effective only on a given arch.
Fix if possible.
Ignorable spelling error.
libbonobo.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion bonobo-activation obsoletes
bonobo-activation = 2.32.1-2.fc18
The package obsoletes itself. This is known to cause errors in various tools
and should thus be avoided, usually by using appropriately versioned Obsoletes
and/or Provides and avoiding unversioned ones.
libbonobo-devel.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion bonobo-activation-devel obsoletes
bonobo-activation-devel = 2.32.1-2.fc18
The package obsoletes itself. This is known to cause errors in various tools
and should thus be avoided, usually by using appropriately versioned Obsoletes
and/or Provides and avoiding unversioned ones.
Fix.
libbonobo.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
/etc/bonobo-activation/bonobo-activation-config.xml
A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A
way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file:
%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here
Fix if reasonable.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license ( GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r
So it's just the rpmlitn bits, let me know if you want me to commit anything.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.