https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991221
--- Comment #3 from Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi.boukelmoune(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
Informal review (I'm not a packager):
Looks like a useful tool!
The license is "BSD" in Fedora [1] (aka "New BSD License",
"BSD-new", etc.).
I'm used to the FreeBSD license (mainly because I don't have any trademark to
protect...). I saw "Intel" in the middle of the file and didn't think
further... Thanks for review.
The package is correct and follows all packaging guidelines, afaict.
Builds fine [2].
I was wondering if the spec should explicitely exclude non-intel architectures:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelin...
Spec URL:
https://bitbucket.org/dridi/fedora_packages/downloads/numatop.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bitbucket.org/dridi/fedora_packages/downloads/numatop-1.0.1-2.fc1...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a6DuL29KhV&a=cc_unsubscribe