https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317939
--- Comment #4 from Benji Wiebe <benjiwiebe14(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
But %description should be a bit longer: what can you do with this
package,
what is the output, is special hardware required, etc. Doesn't have to be
exhaustive, one paragraph is enough.
It is a *bit* longer...I hope that's good enough.
During review it is customary to bump the revision after major
changes,
add stuff to %changelog, and upload the SRPM under a new name. The
spec file is updated in place.
OK, I'll do that from now on.
I meant rpm package ownership. Your package creates those directories
so it
should own them.
Aha, I caught on about RPM ownership. I uninstalled dump1090 on my PC, and the
directories are still there. I fixed that now.
Hm, I don't remember what those were. That's why it's
helpful to keep
old srpms accessible.
They were rtl-sdr and libusb. Both are picked up automatically by RPM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component