Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> 2011-06-08 03:39:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Why is it not necessary? The makefile they create uses those things,
if they
are for some reason missing...
This isn't required because we have a list of packages installed by default
into rpmbuildroot. However explicitly listing them (as you did) is harmless and
isn't an issue.
* Youd package doesn't use CFLAGS - this is a blocker.
* Missing COPYING in %doc - this ia a strong requirement.
* Also adding Doc as %doc sounds like a generally good idea (as well as
"readme" and "updates.htm" files).
* What's the purpose of the Data directory? Is it required for normal
application's operation or not? I think these are jus an examples so they
should be packaged as %doc but I'm not sure.
* Correct licensing tag should be GPLv3+ not a "GPLv3 (or later)".
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.