https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> ---
if [ $1 -eq 1 ] && [ -x systemctl ]; then
systemctl start %{name}.service > /dev/null 2>&1 || :
fi
This must to be removed.
> After six hours of hairpulling I decided to declare defeat. I
tried
> different combinations of the (limited) options offered by %find_lang,
> even"--all-name", but it plainly refuses to find the files:
I don't know too much about this either. Let's leave it for now,
maybe somebody else will have some idea.
/usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh checks only some
pecific locations for
the language files. This package uses different locations, so it is hard
to reconcile the two. But it also has just a bunch of those files, so
I think it's OK to just ignore the issue (%lang attribute is not applied).
https://github.com/sezanzeb/input-remapper would be better.
/usr/share/doc/input-remapper/README.md is not useful for Fedora users.
It describes how to install the package from the web and knows nothing about
the ready-to-install rpm. My suggestion would be to add a README.Fedora
file that mentions 'dnf install input-remapper', and 'systemctl enable --now
input-remapper'
and gives some instructions how to start configuring the service under
gnome-shell and
other systems.
With the above changes:
+ package name is correct
+ license is acceptable for Fedora (GPL-3.0-or-later)
+ license is specified correctly
+ P/R/BR look OK
+ builds and installs OK
+ the program seems to work (*).
(*) I did a very simple test that remapping 'x' to 'KEY_BACKSLASH' works
as
expected
for a user logged in with gnome.
I also wanted to remap to KEY_A, but the dialog says KEY_A is not valid. It
seems something
is buggy about the listing of the keys, and more complicated keys like
KEY_BACKSLASH are
accepted, but simple ones like KEY_A are not. But it's also possible I
misunderstood the
interface, I wasn't trying very hard.
Anyway, the packaging is OK. Whether the package has bugs is not in scope of
the review,
so I only did some very superficial check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418