Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749055
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2011-11-02 15:45:15 EDT ---
I'm not sure I agree with any license that's not marked GPLv2+ here. Sure,
there are some sources that are LGPLv2+, GPLv2+, but the aggregate license of
those combined sources for both the library and activitymanager pieces ends up
being GPLv2+
The ontologies are fun too, only used during the build process (via
onto2vocabularyclass too) to generate some sources/headers, but each of those
generated files are clearly marked LGPLv2+
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.