https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991639
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net> ---
So, "fedora-review -b 991639" completes and doesn't complain about
anything.
Let's see what else there is:
[...]
Differences between python3-facct and python-facct.
* The Python2 build specifies "Group: Development/Libraries", whereas the
Python3 build sets "Group: Applications/Productivity".
* The Python2 requires texlive-latex and ghostscript, the Python3 build
doesn't.
Those are no blockers, but worth fixing later prior to a first release at
Fedora.
As for the run-time, I'm not sure, do you want this to be more of a Python
module/framework or a set of command-line tools? Or both at once? The
README.txt examples call scripts via "python …" and relative paths, which
isn't
convenient and would only work when entering the top-level Python facct module
dir.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0pek4v1YMk&a=cc_unsubscribe