https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408
--- Comment #6 from Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5)
> lasem.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/liblasem-0.4.so.4.0.3 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
probably can be filled to upstream
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768591
> lasem.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/lasem/COPYING
MUST be filled bug to upstream. Every file in src/ has incorrect FSF address
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768590
> I think I do - otherwise the directory ownership guideline [2]
might be violated I think. lasem puts files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc but does not depend on
it, so it needs to own it. %doc only owns the lasem-0.4 folder.
I think with %doc it's not needed.
Why? %doc or no %doc, files are getting placed in a folder which could be left
dangling if package is uninstalled.
There is bundled itex2mml in sources, add following:
Licese: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+
Not sure about this one... As per COPYING.itex2mml, itex2mml is tri-licensed:
GPL, MPL and LGPL, with no version specified. On the other hand, licensecheck
says it's GPLv3+
Provides: bundled(itex2mml) = 1.4.5
%license itex2mml/COPYING.itex2mml
Agreed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component