https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014853
Ben Beasley <code(a)musicinmybrain.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(code@musicinmybra |
|in.net) |
--- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley <code(a)musicinmybrain.net> ---
(In reply to Iztok Fister Jr. from comment #2)
Ben, just a quick update. I have already sent an email as well as
opened
issue in main repository. However, there are no changes.
Shall we guess a BSD license and proceed with packaging?
Yes, I suppose that’s the only path forward unless upstream suddenly decides to
respond.
We already have an appropriate copyright statement for modestmaps-py content
from the geotiler upstream:
# Copyright (C) 2007-2013 by Michal Migurski and other contributors
You can combine this with the text from
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause to produce a BSD license file,
which you can install as something like LICENSE-modestmaps-py. You can add a
spec file comment like:
# Upstream for modestmaps-py was asked to clarify the exact BSD license
# text via
https://github.com/stamen/modestmaps-py/issues/19 and by direct
# email to Michal Migurski. Since that upstream has remained unresponsive,
# the intended license text is assumed to be the 3-clause BSD license from
#
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause (as the more restrictive of
# the two most common BSD variants, the other being
#
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause).
The effective license for the package overall remains GPLv3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2014853