https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924
--- Comment #9 from Steven Jay Munroe <munroesj52(a)gmail.com> ---
pveclib.src: W: invalid-license APACHE
So you want this spelled out as "Apache Software License 2.0" or the short form
"ASL 2.0" ?
pveclib.ppc64le: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information
/usr/lib64/libpvec.so.0.0.0
The current build only uses the static libraries for some unit tests. As is
these libraries only contains arrays of large numeric constants. But this might
change in later pveclib version are more complex operations are added.
pveclib.ppc64le: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/licenses/pveclib/COPYING LICENSE
looks like I am caught on the horns of the "LICENSE" vs "COPYING"
controversy:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5678462/should-i-provide-a-license-tx...
The symlink avoids duplicating the file. While preserving COPYING for lint
checks that insist on that file is there.
Not sure why it is "dangling" because it is used in Makefile.am
+dist_license_DATA = COPYING
+dist_doc_DATA = CONTRIBUTING.md README.md ChangeLog.md
Based on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536209 I assumed this is
what you (Fedora) wanted.
I am working on the other issues.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component