https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510877
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jančo <jjanco(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #15)
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Artistic (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 18 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/var/tmp/rev/1510877-perl-LMDB_File/licensecheck.txt
RWMJ: The LICENSE file is Artistic. The source files in the package
don't seem to contain any license text. The License tag in the spec
file is "GPL+ or Artistic". Is that correct? There is no problem
with the license itself, it's all open source.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[?]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
RWMJ: See above.
According to
http://search.cpan.org/~sortiz/LMDB_File-0.12/ it is only Artistic
2, I didnt find any other licenses. Changed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component