https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269603
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> ---
Please link to the raw spec file. Otherwise fedora-review doesn't work ootb.
Yep, looks good. The %description is kind of hard to parse, but I don't use
vim, maybe it would make sense if I did.
I think you should change the Summary to be something like "Comment stuff out
in vim using ...".
- license is OK
- license file is not present, but that's fine for a 35 line script that uses a
common license :)
- requires/provides are ok
- appdata file is present, nice!
- scriptlets are ok
- latest version
- fedora-review doesn't complain
- rpmlint:
vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcc -> cc, g cc
vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gc -> cg, g, c
vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcap -> gap,
cap, g cap
All OK.
vim-commentary.noarch: W: invalid-url URL:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3695 HTTP Error 503: Service
Unavailable
Works for me.
Package is APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component