Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592388
--- Comment #4 from Aditya Patawari <adimania(a)gmail.com> 2010-05-15 15:35:19 EDT
---
Informal Review
+RPM Lint output
vor.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US excelent -> excellent,
excellence, excellency
vor.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play,
game-play, nameplate
vor.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US synthoid -> synthesized,
synthetic, synthesis
vor.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumpy -> thump, thumps, thump
y
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
+ Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ SPEC file is legible and properly named.
+ Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ License Verified (GPLv2+).
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ MD5 matched a4eb90351dc19413e82ac0bc5269bc42
+ No System binaries Bundled.
+ Koji Build checked.
+ BuildRoot is fine :%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u}
-n).
+ BuildRequires verified.
+ Files and Files permissions are right.
+ %defattr present.
+ %doc section is fine.
+ Clean section is correct.
+ Package is code and has permissible content.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
+ No need of separate devel, doc and static package.
+ File names are valid UTF-8
Status: Package seems all right to me. Has to be approved by a package
maintainer.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.