https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Bluhm <fedoraproject.org(a)bluhm-de.com> ---
I just installed the fedora-review-plugin-java, and this issue came
out.
I think it doesn't allow you to BR javapackages-local and BR maven-local instead (?)
Yepp, missed it. will be updated. Thank you.
License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
I think there might be misunderstanding from my side. I understood that this is
the licensing of the package and not the content. That is why I picked that
one. Should it be the license of the source files?
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
xpp3-minimal
As far as I understand, minimal is a smaller version of xpp3 and can be
installed stand alone. So xpp3-minimal should not have a requirement to xpp3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component