https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119830
--- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>
---
(In reply to Kalvin McCallum from comment #5)
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_devel_packages
I wrote that already in comment #2.
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
Your review contains many entries which require manual review but are
not marked with pass/fail/not-applicable.
Please fill the unchecked boxes to make a complete review if you intend
to take it up officially.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119830