https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510565
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Miroslav Lichvar from comment #2)
Thanks, I'll fix that in the next release. Would you like to do a
full
review?
In order to not lose ntpstat after an upgrade, I was planning to add
Recommends or Requires to the ntp package, but I'm wondering if there is not
a better way. If ntpstat obsoleted the old ntp package and required "(ntp or
chrony)", I suspect an upgrade could result in an installed ntp being
replaced by chrony as the new requirement would be satisfied without ntp.
What about:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies#Real_life_example ?
Both chrony and ntp should provide some "service" and ntpstat should depend on
this "service" and suggest chrony as preferred provider.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component