https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489
--- Comment #7 from Axilleas Pipinellis <axilleas(a)archlinux.gr> ---
A(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
> > 3, Should the license be "X11 or MIT" (taken from the README)? Since
only
> > MIT is included as a standalone file and in the .gemspec, it's probably
> > better to list only MIT. Maybe you can ask upstream for clarification?
>
> I filled an issue:
https://github.com/flori/tins/issues/5
They are the same license, MIT for is the right one for Fedora.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List
Anyhow, the author was kind enough to release a 0.8.4 version, which clarifies
the license :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=l1yWQ9QWgK&a=cc_unsubscribe