https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510877
--- Comment #19 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
I looked at the sources. The situation is this:
LICENSE: Artistic 2.0 text
lib/LMDB_File.pm: Artistic 2.0
ppport.h: GPL+ or Artistic
README: GPL+ or Artistic
LMDB.xs: GPL+ or Artistic
Makefile.PL: Artistic 2.0
Therefore the tag should be:
License: (GPL+ or Artistic) and Artistic 2.0
What license coveres other files like tests under ./t is unclear because README
and LICENSE do not agree. I recommend to ask upstream for clarification.
But that does not prevent you from packaging this software. The license as
expressed in my example is acceptable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component