https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan(a)hubbitus.info> ---
(In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #7)
> Why binaries placed ony in python3 package?
The python2 and python3 binaries should work the same. According to the
guidelines, I may add them in only one package, the python3 one if possible.
I can add them for python2 if you wish.
No. According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin you
indeed may package version built by any version of python untill it provide
same functionality.
But it should be placed in python-recommonmark, nor python2-recommonmark nor
python3-recommonmark. Please see python-pygments provided as example in
guidelines.
> [!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
> You must require both
I do: I have the BuildRequires: python2-devel in the python 2 subpackage
and BuildRequires: python3-devel in the python3 one.
I'm not sure there, but
example list it also in main package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file
Possible you are right and it may be equal... Is not?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component