https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012522
--- Comment #15 from Maxwell G <gotmax(a)e.email> ---
(In reply to Mikel Olasagasti Uranga from comment #14)
Any reason to have 3 subpackages for shell-completion variants?
I've check and just a few packages are doing this way while many other just
install the shell-completion files as part of the main package.
Hi Mikel,
Thank you for asking.
I want users to be able to install only the completions for the shell that they
use or even no completions at all. I set this up so that, as long as the user
hasn't disabled weak deps[1], dnf will automatically install the bash
completions only if `bash-completion` is also installed and the same for the
other shell completion packages. I got this idea from one of OpenSUSE's
packages, and I think it's quite elegant. Another reviewer seemed to agree[2].
Suggests and Supplements clauses are wisely used
Thanks,
Maxwell
[1]:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/WeakDependencie...
[2]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012522#c3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012522