https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242058
Benson Muite <benson_muite(a)emailplus.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai |
|lplus.org) |
--- Comment #32 from Benson Muite <benson_muite(a)emailplus.org> ---
Thanks. It builds. Would suggest the following as license information
# the project license declared in meson.build is "MIT OR Apache-2.0"
# but it also uses some MIT licensed headers and OpenGL headers are
# under the MIT-Khronos license, some files only have Apache-2.0
# license information.
License: MIT AND Apache-2.0 AND MIT-Khronos-old
# in the source package there are a number of other licenses
# that are (CC-BY-4.0) and not included in the
# software installed by the produced rpms,
# see the project LICENSE for a partial listing.
The MIT-Khronos-old is an allowed license:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/
though the text is not available from SPDX website.
You could add the output of the fedora-review licensecheck file
as a listing of what license each file is under. There does not seem
to be a simple way to indicate licenses of each component. For files
without license information, assume these are MIT OR Apache-2.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242058
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...