https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
--- Comment #7 from Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I've changed the license tag to MIT to reflect the actual license in the source
file. Since this file contains its own license in text form, I don't think
there's a particular need to include a separate copy.
Since there is a single small file, I don't think that gains anything. This
source is smaller than most patches. If there were multiple sources, I would do
that.
In this case should follow the guidelines for EPEL5
Added Buildroot tag to match.
Updated:
Spec URL:
http://mattdm.fedorapeople.org/ec2-metadata.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mattdm.fedorapeople.org/ec2-metadata-2012.08.30-2.fc18.mattdm.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.