Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618638
Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com> 2010-07-28 04:20:17 EDT
---
- rpmlint checks return:
- package meets naming guidelines OK
- package meets packaging guidelines OK
- license (Artistic 2.0) OK, text in %doc, matches source OK
- spec file legible, in am. english OK
- source matches upstream bc1d60d004b8b4d6aa8c11f3c4ccbc5f OK
- package compiles on devel (x86) OK
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2355937
- no missing BR OK
- no unnecessary BR OK
- no locales OK
- not relocatable OK
- owns all directories that it creates OK
- no duplicate files OK
- permissions ok OK
- %clean ok OK
- macro use consistent OK
- code, not content OK
- no need for -docs OK
- nothing in %doc affects runtime OK
- no need for .desktop file OK
Comments:
Kwalitee tests don't have to run.
Patches should be sent to upstream, but I suppose your patch make this module
work with older releases in EPEL, so they won't be applied in upstream anyway.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.