Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: glib2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225804
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2007-02-06 06:03 EST -------
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
Considering the discussions on bug 225875 (see comments by Patrice
Dumas and
Ralf Corsepius), please either own the directory or depend on something that
does. I believe this is mostly to make sure that installing the package and then
removing it doesn't leave empty directories around.
You are right on the spot -
This is what this is all about.
All other blockers are fixed now. The package is fine
In
addition to what has already been said: When building the fc7/devel glib2
package on fc6, the test-suite hangs.
Final rpmlint output:
W: glib2 non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/glib2.sh
W: glib2 non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/glib2.csh
These are OK.
E: glib2-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
E: glib2-static devel-dependency glib2-devel
W: glib2-static no-documentation
W: glib2-static devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libglib-2.0.a
W: glib2-static devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libgobject-2.0.a
W: glib2-static devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libgthread-2.0.a
W: glib2-static devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libgmodule-2.0.a
These are not fine. glib2 can install its runtime libs into /lib if it needs to,
but installing devel-libs there is NOT OK.
Matthias, please check how glibc is being packaged. They install the
runtime-parts into /lib and install the devel parts to %{_libdir}
(Technically this should not be much more than an ordinary %configure plus
moving the lib*.so.* in %install)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.