https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #5 from Chris Caron <lead2gold(a)gmail.com> ---
Thank you guys for all your feedback. It was also suggested on the mailing
lists to not use flake8 as it's to harsh to fail a %test because of a pep8
issue. I couldn't agree with this more, so i dropped this to just be py.test
references instead. I'll satisfy my own PEP8 OCD with travisCI and not with
RPMS.
I should add that i'm also the developer of this product. So yes i realize i
pushed a new version out but supplied you with the last one. It was kind of
happening at the same time.
I addressed all of the comments you identified above (including the new version
reference):
Updated Spec:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lead2gold/apprise/fedora-...
Here is the Koji output:
epel7:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33411608
f28:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33411610
f29:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33411612
f30:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33411614
rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33411616
Copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lead2gold/apprise/build/866973/
On a side note; the license was recently changed (About a month or so ago) from
GPLv3 to MIT. I didn't realize i didn't update this on the header of my SPEC
file. I'll update this on the next build.
Thank you guys again for all of your feedback!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component