Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2008-09-18
14:23:13 EDT ---
For 0.3-1:
* Summary
- I think the current Summary is not good sentence to
explain this package shortly...
* License
- The codes used in cave9_src-0.3.tgz are actually under
GPLv3+ (although COPYING.txt shows LGPLv3...)
- The data files in cave9_data-4.tgz are licensed under
CC-BY, CC-BY-SA.
So the License tag must be "GPLv3+ and CC-BY and CC-BY-SA".
* BuildRequires
- This srpm uses desktop-file-install so "BuildRequires:
desktop-file-utils" is missing.
* sourceURL
- Source0,1 must be written with full URL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
* Macros
- Use macros for standard directories. For example
/usr/bin must be %{_bindir}
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
* Timestamps
- When using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option
to keep timestamps on installed files:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps
* Documents
- data/README.txt in cave9_data-4.tgz contains the needed
license information of data tarball so this file
must be added to %doc.
! Question
- Is it possible to create a seperate srpm for hud.ttf
font? (do you know where hud.ttf is originally distributed?)
Currently Fedora strongly suggests not to package
bundled fonts:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fon...
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.