https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087143
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> ---
I would say it is useful to give
Let's keep it then :-)
Likely could be viewed as a useful add-on, but maybe not worth to
have it split from remainder of Robot Framework?
I think it is not necessary. Let's keep it within the main
package. In the future, if there is a need for separating it into a
subpackage, it can be done then.
These are then not delivered in the RPM
This IMHO isn't true. Check this out:
[root@14bd960974e7 /]# rpm -ql python3-robotframework |grep htmldata/lib/
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/robot/htmldata/lib/jquery.highlight.min.js
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/robot/htmldata/lib/jquery.min.js
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/robot/htmldata/lib/jquery.tablesorter.min.js
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/robot/htmldata/lib/jquery.tmpl.min.js
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/robot/htmldata/lib/jsxcompressor.min.js
Of course the question may be: should we better deliver also the full
HTML docs?
Whatever option you prefer, you will be the one maintaining it :-)
Personally, I don't ship HTML docs for my packages.
If you decide to ship the HTML documentation, it should IMHO go into a
subpackage.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_docume...
The raw file ... ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087143